A- de 2024
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Antonio José Lizarazo Ocampo
✓Claimant Rendón Montaño Lina Marcela Y Otras·Respondent --
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Finalidad
- Incumplimiento de la carga argumentativa
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica.
La demanda se rechazó porque su corrección fue infructuosa en tanto el escrito de subsanación no logró corregir las deficiencias indicadas en el auto de inadmisión.
La Sala Plena de la Corporación decidió RECHAZAR el recurso impetrado por incumplir con la carga argumentativa mínima requerida para su estudio.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. RECHAZAR el recurso de súplica presentado contra el auto proferido el 15 de abril de 2024 por el magistrado Jorge Enrique Ibáñez Najar que rechazó la demanda de inconstitucionalidad formulada por las ciudadanas Lina Marcela Rendón Montaño, Luz Adriana Díaz Díaz y Fabiola del Pilar Quintero en contra de los artículos 420 y 476 del Decreto Ley 624 de 1989.
- SEGUNDO. Por intermedio de la Secretaría General de la Corte Constitucional,
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.